The lunar eclipse of Jan 20, 2019. Top image is just after totality had set in. Second image is about mid-eclipse.
I finally tried my phone with the afocal camera holder and the dob I use from time to time. Yes, it works. But, the image quality is definitely poor compared to my DSLR’s.
A couple of nights later, I setup the TV-85 refractor/Canon T3 combo and took some shots. One was of the moon before the sun had set. Here it is in two versions – as taken and converted to look like a nighttime shot:
I was setting up for some deep sky and the moon made a convenient test target. Later that night, I shot some images of Comet 64P. Unfortunately, I was cut off by clouds after only 10 sub-images. I was going to just throw this out, but I managed to make an image out of the paltry amount of data, so it is not a complete loss.
Check it out:
So far, I’ve managed to image Comet 46P/Wirtanen four times during this apparition with my TV-85 scope and twice with camera lenses. For this time of the year, that is pretty good. December and January are usually months of unending rain and clouds down here in Cajun Country.
Now that the main part of Comet Wirtanen’s visit is over, it is a good time to do a roundup of the data and see the bigger picture. So, I took the best four star-freeze versions from those four times with the telescope and combined them into one display image above. That way, you can easily compare the shape of the comet and see how it changed depending on our angle of view at the time.
The dust and ion tails were both mostly hidden behind the huge coma on this comet. It was huge because it was so close to us. But, since it was still further from the Sun than we are and the Sun, Earth and comet were in a line, the tails were pointing directly away from us. That foreshortens the length of the tail and makes it look like it doesn’t even have one at times. It is just the geometry of the view angle and the way the coma can overwhelm the dim tails when they are behind it from our vantage point.
When we were more at an angle to the Sun-comet angle, the tail appeared longer. When we were in-line with it and the Sun, the tail decreased. So, it is not totally comet activity at this point that controls tail length, it is view angle and how much is behind a thick coma. You still have the solar wind and how chaotic it is that causes the tail to “flap” like a flag when the wind varies. But, mostly view angle.
46P came in low going high and crossed our orbit then angled above the elliptic plane heading away from the Sun. Our view now is from underneath, you would say. That is why the tail is south now when it was mostly on the north side when it was below the elliptic.
I had been wanting to try imaging 46P with the 200mm telephoto lens I have. I thought I could bust through the LP with the addition of the Lumicon 72mm Deep Sky filter that fits that lens. Oh, well… not enough pass-through for the comet wavelengths and blocking of the LP. It helped, but not enough in the white zone I was shooting from. It works for H-Alpha nebulae, but not much for other stuff.
After a long spate of cloudy and wet weather, it finally cleared enough for imaging on the night of Jan 4th/5th, 2019. My last imaging session was just before Christmas, so it had been a while.
The imaging went reasonably well, just getting home was a little difficult due to car trouble, but I made it. Then, I locked myself out the vehicle before I could unload my stuff. Doh! Oh, well… $60 bucks later I was busy working on this image (without getting any sleep, either. ) 🙂
After doing the above images, i did another take on the star-freeze version with this cropped and more gaudy version below. I think it catches more of the extent of the whole comet like the star-streaks version does:
Speaking of the star-streak version, the one I did below is almost pristine. I barely did anything to it. It shows the ion tail much better than the first star-freeze versions, too: